![]() Forīy default, pandoc produces a document fragment. If no input-files are specified, input is read from Markdown to all formats aspire to be perfect, conversions fromįormats more expressive than pandoc’s Markdown can be expected to Some document elements, such as complex tables, may not fit into Of a document, but not formatting details such as margin size. Pandoc attempts to preserve the structural elements Should not expect perfect conversions between every format andĮvery other. Less expressive than many of the formats it converts between, one Users canīecause pandoc’s intermediate representation of a document is Output format requires only adding a reader or writer. Or AST), and a set of writers, which convert this native Representation of the document (an abstract syntax tree Which parse text in a given format and produce a native Pandoc has a modular design: it consists of a set of readers, ![]() Lists, metadata blocks, footnotes, citations, math, and Pandoc’s enhanced version of Markdown includes syntax for tables, definition For the full lists of input and output formats, see the Pandoc can convert between numerous markup and word processingįormats, including, but not limited to, various flavors of Markdown,ĭocx. But once you're using Campaign, you'll likely never want to go back to anything else, as the content/editing approach & experience is just so great.Library for converting from one markup format to another, and aĬommand-line tool that uses this library. Given the list size you're talking about, you'll definitely want to spend more time on the performance optimisation than most would normally need to do, do some extensive testing, and just be aware of this during your development. With caching, this can be significantly improved but we have had some issues with stale previews etc when doing this, so don't feel we have things quite right yet. (Without any performance optimisation/caching, using MJML based templates, and using a $20 Vultr VPS, it's about 10+ hours to send to the list. That is of course inherent to the Campaign approach of using Craft templates and your server. We have about 10000 on our list, use Postmark as our ESP (they are brilliant - best SAAS I've ever used!) - but the sending does take a fair while and place a noticeable amount of load on the server during that time. Indeed, with those, often you might want to slow things down and stagger delivery to prevent the inevitable server hit from all those folks clicking on your links etc., when you do a send out. If you're used to Mailchimp or similar, you'll know the entire thing sends in the blink of any eye with those services - even to massive lists. My only caveat to raise is with the sending performance side of things. And the more you send, the more you save! ![]() The cost is dramatically cheaper than any service based alternative. Things like MJML or similar can greatly help ease that development of course. ![]() Of course the developer has to do a bunch of work on email templates (ergh!) - to get the quality of content delivery to similar levels to what you get out of the box with a service. The approach is just superb - being able to edit in the CMS, and use existing content, is revelatory vs. Campaign is an excellent plugin, and Ben a truly excellent and supportive developer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |